L’AISNA e il comitato organizzativo della XXVI Conferenza Biennale AISNA, che si terrà presso l’Università degli Studi dell’Aquila dal 23 al 25 settembre 2021, comunicano che il termine per presentare panel proposals è stato prorogato al 7 maggio 2021. Per ulteriori informazioni sulle modalità di invio delle proposte, vi rimandiamo al CFP originale.

Condividiamo la locandina e il programma della 2nd AISNA Graduates Conference, “Voting Divide: The Changing Boundaries of Citizenship in the United States.”
La conferenza, organizzata con il supporto dell’U.S. Embassy in Italy, si terrà venerdì 6 maggio 2021 (dalle 10,00 alle 17,15) sulla piattaforma Zoom e sarà trasmessa dal Centro Studi Americani.
Il convegno seguirà le giornate di studio del Seminario CSA e avremo il piacere di avere con noi la Presidente Gigliola Nocera per inaugurare i lavori.
È possibile registrarsi gratuitamente su Eventbrite. Una volta iscritti, riceverete un invito alla piattaforma Zoom in prossimità della conferenza.

Condividiamo il programma, il bando e il modulo di iscrizione per il prossimo Seminario di Letteratura Storia e Cultura Americana, organizzato dal Centro Studi Americani di Roma in collaborazione con l’AISNA e l’ U.S. Embassy to Italy, dal 3-5 maggio 2021.

Vi preghiamo di far pervenire le vostre segnalazioni e i moduli debitamente firmati e compilati dagli studenti via e-mail a Sara Ammenti (Biblioteca del CSAs.ammenti@centrostudiamericani.org) non oltre il 21 aprile 2021.

The GHI awards short-term research fellowships to European and North American doctoral students as well as postdoctoral scholars to pursue research projects that draw upon primary sources principally located in North America. We are particularly interested in research projects that fit into the following fields:
  • German and European history
  • The history of German-American relations
  • The role of Germany and the USA in international relations
  • North American history and Pan American, including Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean (European doctoral and postdoctoral scholars only)
The proposed research projects should make use of historical methods and engage with the relevant historiography. We especially invite applications from doctoral students and postdoctoral scholars who currently have no funding from their home institutions. The fellowships are usually granted for periods of one to five months but, in exceptional cases and depending on the availability of funds, they can be extended by one month.
The GHI will not provide funding for preliminary research, manuscript composition, or the revision of manuscripts. It will give clear priority to those postdoc projects that are designed for the “second book.” The fellowship is open to both doctoral and postdoctoral scholars based in North America and Europe. The monthly stipend is € 2,000 for doctoral students and € 3,400 for postdoctoral scholars. In addition, fellowship recipients based in Europe will receive reimbursement for their round-trip airfare to the U.S.
The next deadline for applications is April 1, 2021.
Eligibility Requirements
  • Applicants should be based at (or recent graduates of) a North American or European university or research institute.
  • For doctoral students applying, ABD status is required before starting the fellowship.
  • For postdoctoral scholars applying, the preference is for projects that are designed for the “second book” (Habilitation or equivalent).
  • The proposed project should require primary research that is principally located in North America.
To apply please send the following materials using the online application form or (as a pdf) to fellowships@ghi-dc.org by April 1, 2021.
  1. A brief cover letter
  2. Curriculum vitae
  3. A copy of your most recent diploma or transcripts
  4. Project description (no more than 2,000 words)
  5. Research schedule for the fellowship
  6. At least one letter of reference (sent separately to fellowships@ghi-dc.org)
Please combine all of your application materials except for the application form into a single PDF and include a word count at the end of your project description. Applicants may write in either English or German; we recommend that they use the language in which they are most proficient. Applicants will be notified about the outcome approximately two months after the deadline.
L’edizione 2020 dell'”EAAS Rob Kroes Publication Award for an Unpublished Book-Length Manuscript”  è stata vinta dalla socia AISNA Martina Mastandrea, per l’opera F. Scott Fitzgerald on Silent Film. La motivazione del premio è la seguente: “The manuscript does a highly competent job of bringing everything that is known about the silent film adaptations of Fitzgerald’s works together into one readable and entertaining body of work”.

We are delighted to share with you the Call for Panels for  the 26th Biennial AISNA Conference, “Crossing Territories. Recognition across Time, Space and Textuality in the US and Beyond.” The conference will take place in L’Aquila (Italy) from September 23 to 25, 2021. The call will soon also be available on the event’s website (currently under construction).

CFP: JAm It! #5, Special Issue
“Watching the Watchmen:” The State of Policing in U.S. Cultural Production

US obsession with policing can be traced back as far as John Winthrop’s sermon “A Model of Christian Charity” (climaxed in the noted “the eyes of all people are on us”), delivered in 1630 on board of the Arbella. In one of white America’s foundational texts, the “eyes of all people” stand as an early figuration of panoptical undercurrents in the United States, whereby a professedly metaphysical yet very concrete control is enforced to safeguard social and ethical order. Canonical US literature, from Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter to Ralph Ellison’s Invisible Man also reminds us that order, even when not deferred to the State, has been violently enforced through coercion, stigma, or segregation throughout the history of the nation. Echoing the seminal figure of Esther Prynne, narratives produced by authors as diverse as W. E. B. Du Bois, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and, more recently, Sandra Cisneros, Louise Erdrich, and Ta-Nehisi Coates, are figurations and proofs of the United States’ leviathan policing apparatus and its employment in regulating non-conforming subjects in the name of a perfectly-engineered City Upon a Hill and the capitalistic permutation of its transcendental concept of social order. 

The state systematically marshals the bodies of its citizens through practices such as biopower and necropolitics; in doing so, it also shapes and channels our understanding of race, gender, sexuality, and identity. This is especially evident in the US prison system, with its world-record constellation of institutions that actively re-design the institutional contours of national social inequality while also standing as a demonstration of how unfettered capitalism (even in its neoliberalist guise) predates on minoritarian and oppressed subjects for its reproduction. The recent wave of events across the United States and growing appeals to states of exception have further called attention to systematic police brutality and its role in stabilizing authority as part of the state apparatus. Across the nation, citizens are fighting back against what Herbert Marcuse has called “surplus-repression,” that is, “the restrictions necessitated by social domination,” (1955, 35) that characterize ideology and praxis of advanced industrial societies up to their contemporary neoliberal incarnations. If racialized violence that has been perpetrated since the Federalist Era through both institutional and private forms of racial policing reverberates in the murders of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and Ahmaud Arbery; the protesting, marching, and rioting that ensued – culminated in the Defund the Police movement and in the deployment of federal troops to contain protests and protestors – point to the desire of new forms of governance (and self-governance) from the opposite poles of the political spectrum: a counter-apparatus from below, aiming to citizens empowerment and liberation, on the one hand, and what we may call a “neo-conservative revolution,” aimed at preserving old white patriarchal structures. 

The aim of this Special Issue of JAm It! (Journal of American Studies in Italy) is not only to discuss representations and histories of police and policing across multiple systems but also to analyze (and produce) counter-imaginaries, modes of care that aim at seeing, rather than watching, citizens and bodies. At this sensitive moment in American history, when national understandings of, as Michel Foucault would have it, “disciplin[ing] and punish[ing]” are being especially questioned, we look for contributions that, through the analysis of representations and/or cultural artifacts, frame policing in its fluid connections with the way in which US culture and counterculture have imagined and produced systems of control.

Interested scholars should submit a 500-word abstract and brief academic bio to the editors Stefano Morello (veritas44@gmail.com) and Marco Petrelli (marco.petrelli@unito.it), and cc’ing journal@aisna-graduates.online by October 15, 2020. In case of acceptance, essays of no more than 8,000 words will be due January 15, 2021.

Possible areas of inquiry include:

 

  • The policing of space, with an eye to geography, borders, and immigration;
  • The normalization of police brutality throughout U.S. history and the myth of police heroism, as perpetrated through forensic drama, police procedurals and true crime narratives;
  • The role of technology and technocapitalism in containing, disciplining and punishing marginalized individuals (e.g., through technologies with built-in racial bias, such as machine learning, face recognition and quantitative and qualitative data analysis);
  • Prison abolition and abolitionism as connected by both Angela Davis and Ruth Gilmore Wilson;
  • Policing and weaponizing the body (and especially disabled and the destitute bodies), as legitimized and institutionalized by the medical discourse; 
  • Modes of politics from below – of counter-policing, if you will – that aim at replacing the state apparatus in matters of public safety and community support (e.g., The Black Panther Party, #BlackLivesMatter, El Movimiento, ACT UP, etc.);
  • Citizen militias and other forms of private justice as depicted by utopian and dystopian literature, comics, and screen productions (e.g., Margaret Atwood’s dystopian trilogy, US superhero and vigilante comics, the recent Watchmen tv show, etc.) ;
  • Colonial(ist) policing, nationalisms, and their role in patrolling history and national mythologies;
  • The complicity of the academy in promoting a culture of policing and surveillance; 
  • The role of discourse (in all its forms, gossip included) and language as social policing;
  • Ideological and identitarian policing in the current political climate.

 

Suggested Readings

 

Alexander, Michelle. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.  

Balto, Simon. 2019. Occupied Territory, Policing Black Chicago from Red Summer to Black Power. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Davis, Angela Y. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York: Penguin Random House.

———. 2005. Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.

Davis, Mike. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Verso Books. 

Foucault, Michel. 1975. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Paris: Gallimard.

———. 1976. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. Paris: Gallimard.

Gilmore Wilson, Ruth. 2007. Golden Gulag, Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hall, Stuart. 2018 [1980]. “Race, Articulation, and Societies Structured in Dominance.” In Essential Essays, Volume 1: Foundations of Cultural Studies, David Morley, ed. Durham: Duke University Press.

Herbert, Steve. 1996. Policing Space, Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department.  Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Isenberg, Nancy. 2017. White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America. London: Penguin Books.

Lee, Julian C.H. 2011. Policing Sexuality: Sex, Society, and the State. London: Zed Books.

Manning, Peter. 2008. The Technology of Policing: Crime Mapping, Information Technology, and the Rationality of Crime Control. New York: New York University Press.

Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press. Marcuse, Herbert. 1965. “Repressive Tolerance.” In A Critique of Pure Tolerance. Boston: Beacon Press. 

Mbembe, Achille. 2003.  “Necropolitics.” Public Culture. 15, no. 1: 11-40.

McCoy, Alfred W. 2009. Policing America’s Empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of the Surveillance State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Mladek, Klaus, ed. 2007. Police Forces: A Cultural History of an Institution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Nelson, Alondra. 2011. Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight Against Medical Discrimination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Roberts, Dorothy E. 1998. Killing the Black Body, Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Penguin Random House.

Schrader, Stuart. 2019. Badges without Borders, How Global Counterinsurgency Transformed American Policing. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Vitale, Alex. 2017. The End of Policing. London: Verso Books. 

Wilson, Jeremy M. 2006. Community Policing in America. London: Routledge.

In riferimento ai recenti fatti di violenza pubblica ai danni di cittadini afroamericani, il Direttivo ha formulato la seguente dichiarazione. Ci auguriamo interpreti il pensiero e il sentire di tutta l’Associazione e invitiamo chi lo volesse a condividerla e farla circolare.

AISNA (Italian Association for North American Studies) stands in solidarity with militants and advocates of civil rights protesting police brutality, white supremacism, and structural racism in the United States, in Italy, and across the world.

In the past weeks, we read with dismay about the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery. We watched with growing discomfort American police’s violent reaction before lawful expressions of righteous anger and distress. We listened carefully as the protests in the U.S. ignited a debate on structural problems of our societies that stretch well beyond the U.S. and invest our daily practice as teachers and researchers.

As scholars of U.S. literature, culture, history and politics, we understand that today’s problems have deep roots in the country’s long history of slavery, racism, anti-black violence, and imperialist aggression. We deem it crucial to use our knowledge and expertise to promote a more informed, competent and constructive discussion on the problems that the tragic death of Floyd, Taylor, Arbery and many others highlighted.

At the same time, we are committed to listening and learning from protesters, activists, and scholars in Italy who tell us that these problems are not just American problems. We express our support and solidarity to nonwhite communities in Italy who are victims of racial injustice and police brutality.

Black Lives Matter.